What should reviewers focus their comments on during a review?

Reviewers should prioritize comments on content and the author during a review process because the primary aim of a review is to provide constructive feedback that enhances the overall quality and clarity of the work being evaluated. Focusing on content allows reviewers to assess whether the material effectively communicates the intended message and meets the objectives set out in the project. This could involve evaluating the adequacy of the analysis, the logic behind conclusions, and whether the requirements are clearly articulated.

Additionally, commenting on the author is vital in recognizing their perspective and ensuring that feedback is aligned with their style and the audience they are addressing. This aspect emphasizes the importance of maintaining a supportive atmosphere during the review process, where authors feel encouraged to improve their work rather than discouraged by harsh critiques. Prioritizing these elements contributes to a collaborative environment that fosters professional growth and enhances the overall quality of the deliverable.

In contrast, while issues like typos, processes, language, and modeling notation are important, they are more about the technical aspects of the work rather than its core value and intent. Emphasizing these areas might divert attention from the more substantial content that drives the purpose of the document.