Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) Practice Test

The primary purpose of conducting a peer review is to identify inconsistencies in the work being done and ensure that stakeholder needs are being met effectively. This process typically involves team members reviewing each other's work to provide feedback and catch any potential issues that might not be obvious to the original author. By facilitating this systematic examination of outputs, a peer review helps ensure that the final deliverables align with the expectations and requirements set forth by stakeholders.

In peer reviews, reviewers focus on various aspects of the work, including functionality, clarity, and adherence to project standards. This collective responsibility enhances the overall quality of the work and fosters collaboration within the team, ultimately leading to better outcomes for stakeholders.

The other options touch on relevant aspects of the project lifecycle but do not capture the core intent of peer reviews as clearly. While reducing risk from ambiguous requirements, educating stakeholders, and ensuring adherence to quality policies are important, they might not solely reflect the direct aim of a peer review, which centers primarily on reviewing work for consistency and alignment to stakeholder needs.